← Back to Insights
June 25, 2025
Authors
David Burda
Topics
Economics Innovation Outcomes
Channels
4-Minute 4sight Blogs

A Lesson in Aligned Incentives

For more than 40 years, I’ve heard about the healthcare industry’s need to “align incentives” among its various sectors — mostly the provider and payer sectors — if we want to reduce costs, expand access and improve quality.

The fact that we haven’t done it in more than four decades tells me that it’s all but impossible like cold fusion or a perpetual motion machine.

Well, a new study in JAMA Network Open tells me that aligning incentives is possible. But there’s a catch.

Here’s how it could work, according to four researchers affiliated with Los Angeles Medical Center and the UCSF School of Medicine. Their economic model is based on a retrospective analysis of 876 patients who received acute care through an all-virtual hospital-at-home program at the medical center in 2022 and 2023. They compared the revenue and cost of treating those patients with a matched set of 1,590 patients who received acute care in a traditional inpatient care setting.

To summarize the extremely complicated analysis, the hospital-at-home program saved so much money, primarily by cutting reimbursable inpatient bed days, it actually lost money. The revenue from payers for inpatient bed days fell below the hospital-at-home program’s expenses.

For the program to break even, payers would have to reimburse the program at 50% to 60% of what it would normally pay for a traditional inpatient stay even though the program’s reimbursable costs were substantially below that level. In short, payers would pay less than usual but more than they need to keep the program viable.

By aligning incentives, patients would have access to a less expensive acute-care setting — their home — with better outcomes as the likely result. Everybody wins.

That is, except for the provider executive who pitches the idea to break even and the payer executive who recommends their health plan pay more for less. They’d both be out of work pretty quickly.

Healthcare is a business, and businesses exist to make money for their owners. Aligning incentives can work in healthcare, as this study demonstrates, but it will never happen, as this study also demonstrates.

Thanks for reading.

About the Author

David Burda

David Burda began covering healthcare in 1983 and hasn’t stopped since. Dave writes this monthly column “Burda on Healthcare,” contributes weekly blog posts, manages our weekly newsletter 4sight Friday, and hosts our weekly Roundup podcast. Dave believes that healthcare is a business like any other business, and customers — patients — are king. If you do what’s right for patients, good business results will follow.

Dave’s personal experiences with the healthcare system both as a patient and family caregiver have shaped his point of view. It’s also been shaped by covering the industry for 40 years as a reporter and editor. He worked at Modern Healthcare for 25 years, the last 11 as editor.

Prior to Modern Healthcare, he did stints at the American Medical Record Association (now AHIMA) and the American Hospital Association. After Modern Healthcare, he wrote a monthly column for Twin Cities Business explaining healthcare trends to a business audience, and he developed and executed content marketing plans for leading healthcare corporations as the editorial director for healthcare strategies at MSP Communications.

When he’s not reading and writing about healthcare, Dave spends his time riding the trails of DuPage County, IL, on his bike, tending his vegetable garden and daydreaming about being a lobster fisherman in Maine. He lives in Wheaton, IL, with his lovely wife of 40 years and his three children, none of whom want to be journalists or lobster fishermen.

Recent Posts

Default Image
Outcomes
4sight Friday 6/20/25
4sight Friday | A Revenue Cycle for the People | The Healthcare Workforce Is Back | 23andMe and… Read More
By June 20, 2025
Innovation
Podcast: Are You What Your Genetic Material Says You Are? 6/19/25
We revisited the collapse of 23andMe in light of the sale of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing company out… Read More
By June 19, 2025
Consumerism
Revenue Cycle Euphoria: Logical Automation and Consumerism
Author’s note: hfm magazine planned to publish this commentary in its entirety, and subsequently decided it would publish a… Read More
By June 17, 2025