← Back to Insights
September 11, 2018
Authors
David Burda
Topics
Economics Outcomes System Dynamics
Channels
Blogs

A Lesson in Value-Based Payments from Across the Pond

If you paid your kids to clean their rooms and keep them clean, would they? If you stopped paying them, would they keep cleaning their rooms because they realized that having a clean room is a good thing to do anyway? If so, you could use that money to incent them to do something else like cut the grass?

That’s basically what researchers from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, University of Cambridge and the University of Dundee—all in the United Kingdom—wanted to know about paying doctors in England to meet certain quality-of-care indicators. And what they learned could be a lesson for payers here who want their value-based reimbursement schemes to lead to sustainable changes in physician behaviors.

The researchers reported what they learned in the Sept. 6 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, which you can read here.

The researchers studied 18 of 121 quality measure that are part of the National Health Service’s Quality and Outcomes Framework, or QOF, that began in 2004. Under the QOF, the NHS reimburses primary-care practices, or PCPs, a little extra for meeting the measures.

In 2014, the NHS stopped paying incentives to meet 12 of the 18 quality measures and used that money to pay all doctors a little more. It kept paying incentives to PCPs to meet the other six quality measures.

The researchers wanted to know how the end of financial incentives to meet the 12 quality measures affected the behaviors of the PCPs and compare those behaviors with those on the other six measures whose financial incentives didn’t end. The researchers looked at changes in behaviors one year out, two years out and three years out. Their study pool was 2,819 PCPs in England who care for more than 20 million patients.

Any guesses before I tell you what they found and reported in their published research?

Analyzing data in the patients’ EMRs, the researchers found that a large percentage of the PCPs stopped performing—or at least failed to document—the services needed to meet the 12 quality measures. The declines happened immediately the first year after the incentives vanished and stayed there for the next two years.

The biggest drop was in lifestyle counseling for patients with high blood pressure. Some 80.1 percent of the PCPs documented that they were doing that before the incentive went away. That dropped to 17.8 percent the first year after the incentive went away.

The researchers found little change in the behaviors of PCPs on the six measures for which the payment incentives continued. For example, in 2014, 93.2 percent of the PCPs said they gave smoking-cessation advice to smokers with chronic medical conditions. By 2017, that was up to 94.1 percent.

The researchers acknowledged that the PCPs may have continued to provide the services to patients on the 12 quality measures but stopped documenting the services in the patients’ EMRs because there no longer was a reason to prove that they did them. That may be true.

So you have one of three possibilities. Either a large percentage of the doctors stopped providing the 12 services to patients because there wasn’t any extra money in it for them. Or, a large percentage of the doctors stopped documenting the services because there wasn’t any financial reason to do so. Or, a mix of the first two possibilities.

Here’s what the researchers concluded: “The decline probably reflected changes in EMR documentation, but declines on measures involving laboratory testing suggest that incentive removal also changed the care delivered.” And their advice to payers?  “At a minimum, payers planning to remove incentives should monitor the quality of care after removal,” they said.

Most doctors want to do right by their patients. Each time I see my internist, he tells me to stop smoking and lose weight no matter what ailment prompted me to make an appointment. When I tell him that I don’t smoke and never have, he tells me to lose weight. I doubt if he checks those boxes off in my EMR.

So if you want doctors to provide prevention and wellness services to patients, incentivize them. And if you want them to check those boxes off in patients’ EMRs to prove that they provided those services, you may have to pay them to do that, too. If not, it’s just unreimbursed busywork.

That’s how markets work, and medicine is no different.

Author

David Burda is a columnist for 4sight Health and news editor of 4sight Friday, our weekly newsletter. Follow Burda on Twitter @DavidRBurda and on LinkedIn. Read his bio here.

About the Author

David Burda

Dave Burda began covering healthcare in 1983 and hasn’t stopped since. Dave writes this monthly column “Burda on Healthcare,” contributes weekly blog posts, manages our weekly newsletter 4sight Friday, and hosts our weekly Roundup podcast. Dave believes that healthcare is a business like any other business, and customers—patients—are king. If you do what’s right for patients, good business results will follow.

Dave’s personal experiences with the healthcare system both as a patient and family caregiver have shaped his point of view. It’s also been shaped by covering the industry for 35 years as a reporter and editor. He worked at Modern Healthcare for 25 years, the last 11 as editor.

Prior to Modern Healthcare, he did stints at the American Medical Record Association (now AHIMA) and the American Hospital Association. After Modern Healthcare, he wrote a monthly column for Twin Cities Business explaining healthcare trends to a business audience, and he developed and executed content marketing plans for leading healthcare corporations as the editorial director for healthcare strategies at MSP Communications.

When he’s not reading and writing about healthcare, Dave spends his time riding the trails of DuPage County, IL, on his bike, tending his vegetable garden and daydreaming about being a lobster fisherman in Maine. He lives in Wheaton, IL, with his lovely wife of 35 years and his three children, none of whom want to be journalists or lobster fishermen.

 

Recent Posts

Default Image
Innovation
4sight Friday | Healthcare’s Immovable Status Quo | Apple, Amazon and Your PHI | Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act
Read 8/12/2022 Edition here. Curated by David Burda, 4sight Health’s news editor and columnist. Columns here. Find 4sight Health… Read More
By August 12, 2022
Policy
Podcast: A Short-Term Fix With Long-Term Consequences 8/12/22
Inside the Inflation Reduction Act We unpacked the healthcare provisions of the new Inflation Reduction Act and dug… Read More
By August 12, 2022
Economics
Healthcare’s Defining Paradox: Irresistible Consumerism Confronts an Unmovable Status Quo
The 1971 Nebraska vs. Oklahoma college football game featured the defending champion, top-ranked, number-one-defense Nebraska Cornhuskers against the… Read More
By and August 11, 2022