← Back to Insights
September 4, 2020
If Outcomes Matter, Then Start Paying Doctors to Use Clinical Decision Support Tools
Authors
David Burda
Topics
Innovation Outcomes System Dynamics
Channels
Commentaries

If Outcomes Matter, Then Start Paying Doctors to Use Clinical Decision Support Tools

No one likes to be told what to do. If there was a club for people who don’t like to be told what to do, I would be a member. Maybe even a board member.

So I get why a lot of doctors gag on clinical decision support tools. Doctors don’t like computer programs telling them what to do. 

But there’s a big difference between doctors not taking a clue from a computer and me not taking a clue from a computer. When a doctor does it, a patient might die. When I do it, you just get a passive voice in the lede of this blog post.   

A new study in the Journal of Medical Internet Research suggests doctors really should start taking hints from their computers. You can download the study here

Researchers from the School of Health Administration from Texas State University did a meta review of 36 published research articles on practitioners’ use of CDS tools and patient outcomes. The question is whether use of the tools, typically embedded in or connected to EHR systems, improved outcomes. The outcomes fell into seven buckets: symptoms, feedback, disease management, efficacy, screening, safety and mortality. 

Here’s what the researchers found. Of the 36 published research articles: 

  • 22 found a positive connection between CDS use and improved outcomes
  • 11 didn’t report or discuss any connection between CDS use and improved outcomes 
  • 3 found no connection either way between CDS use and improved outcomes

“We found a high level of reporting of positive effects on patient medical outcomes,” the researchers said, adding that their findings “should assist organizations in gaining user acceptance.”

If you show doctors that CDS works, they’ll use it with their patients with two caveats, according to the researchers, who, reading between the lines, probably know a lot of doctors.

One, make sure that CDS tools fit into the physicians’ workflow and are an asset to patient care, not a hindrance. And two, make it clear to doctors that CDS tools augment what they do. They don’t replace what they do or come between them and their patients. 

I’d add a third. Pay doctors to improve outcomes or pay them to use CDS technology or both. If you pay them to improve outcomes, they’ll use CDS. If you pay them to use CDS, outcomes will improve. It’s all about connecting money to outcomes. 

In a previous post, “Interest in Clinical Decision Support Lacking,” we talked about research that showed use of CDS by doctors has increased but the pickup has been excruciatingly slow.  

Physician practices in healthcare are like any other business in any other industry. If you pay them more for good work, they’ll instinctively use better tools. 

Thanks for reading.

Stay home. Stay safe. Stay alive.

About the Author

David Burda

David Burda began covering healthcare in 1983 and hasn’t stopped since. Dave writes this monthly column “Burda on Healthcare,” contributes weekly blog posts, manages our weekly newsletter 4sight Friday, and hosts our weekly Roundup podcast. Dave believes that healthcare is a business like any other business, and customers — patients — are king. If you do what’s right for patients, good business results will follow.

Dave’s personnel experiences with the healthcare system both as a patient and family caregiver have shaped his point of view. It’s also been shaped by covering the industry for 40 years as a reporter and editor. He worked at Modern Healthcare for 25 years, the last 11 as editor.

Prior to Modern Healthcare, he did stints at the American Medical Record Association (now AHIMA) and the American Hospital Association. After Modern Healthcare, he wrote a monthly column for Twin Cities Business explaining healthcare trends to a business audience, and he developed and executed content marketing plans for leading healthcare corporations as the editorial director for healthcare strategies at MSP Communications.

When he’s not reading and writing about healthcare, Dave spends his time riding the trails of DuPage County, IL, on his bike, tending his vegetable garden and daydreaming about being a lobster fisherman in Maine. He lives in Wheaton, IL, with his lovely wife of 40 years and his three children, none of whom want to be journalists or lobster fishermen.

Recent Posts

System Dynamics
Justice Department Sleeping at the Healthcare Fraud Wheel
In a 4sight Health blog post published last month, I said there were only two possible reasons why… Read More
By February 28, 2024
Outcomes
What Will Happen to Traditional Medicare?
The percentage of seniors in Medicare Advantage plans continues to increase, and there has even been speculation that all… Read More
By February 27, 2024
Default Image
Economics
4sight Friday | February 23, 2024
4sight Friday | What FTC Look at GPOs and Drug Distributors Will See | The Story of Year-End… Read More
By February 23, 2024