September 29, 2021
Authors
David Burda
Topics
Economics Outcomes System Dynamics
Channels
Blogs

Transparency Comes to Low-Value Care Providers

Not much has moved the needle on low-value care—published research, medical education campaigns, reimbursement incentives. All have largely failed to stop providers from ordering or performing medical tests, procedures and treatments that offer little or no therapeutic value for patients.  

A study in JAMA Internal Medicine, however, may have unintentionally found the answer: transparency.  Or to be cruder, humiliation. You can download the study here

Researchers from Harvard and Dartmouth wanted to know the health system characteristics most highly correlated with the provision of low-value care. To find out, they analyzed the medical claims data from nearly 12 million Medicare beneficiaries treated by 556 health systems in 2016 and 2017. They looked at the number and percentage of beneficiaries who received at least one of 41 different low-value services in five categories from each of the health systems. The five categories of low-value care were: 

  • Laboratory testing (like ordering a PSA test for men older than 70 to screen for prostate cancer) 
  • Imaging (like performing a head CT scan for sudden hearing loss)
  • Cardiopulmonary and neurologic testing (like performing an EEG for headaches) 
  • Procedures (like performing an angiogram on low-risk patients without cardiac symptoms)
  • Drugs (like prescribing opioids for lower back pain before medical evaluations)

Then, using the 28 of the 41 services that were most prevalent, the researchers devised a low-value care score for each of the health systems, ranging from +4 (most low-value care) to -4 (least low-value care).

Overall, 36 percent of Medicare beneficiaries in the study received at least one low-value service in 2016 or 2017. The three most frequently received low-value services were preoperative lab tests (28 percent of patients got them), PSA tests for older men (27 percent got them) and antipsychotic medications (24 percent of patients with dementia got them). In rank order by most prevalent, the low-value categories finished laboratory testing first followed by drugs, procedures, imaging and cardiopulmonary and neurologic tests. 

Now, here’s the best part, and you may have missed it if you didn’t read through to the end of the study or open the supplemental materials. The researchers named all 556 health systems and assigned a low-value care score to each health system. 

On that scale of +4 to -4, the three health systems that provided the most low-value care were:

  • El Camino Hospital in Mountain View, Calif. (+3.12)
  • Eisenhower Medical Center in Rancho Mirage, Calif. (+2.76)
  • Emerson Hospital Health System in Concord, Mass. (+2.62)

The three health systems that provided the least low-value care were:

  • Grady Health System in Atlanta (-3.08)
  • North Memorial Health Care in Robbinsdale, Minn. (-2.48)
  • Rutland Regional Health Services in Rutland, Vt. (-2.44)

That’s right. The researchers published a ranked list of health system from worst to best when it comes to doing things to patients that the medical literature says you shouldn’t. They named names.

Yes, the researchers did identify health system characteristics most closely correlated with the provision of low-value care. Things like for-profit ownership, fewer primary-care physicians, not affiliated with a teaching hospital, serving a larger non-white patient population and being located in the South or West. That’s all good, noteworthy and potentially actionable for regulators, policymakers and payers. 

But for me, it’s the publicly available list of 556 health systems ranked by performing unnecessary care. Where a local health system ranked on that list should be on the front page of every local newspaper or the top story on every local TV or radio news broadcast. 

Transparency, or humiliation, if you will, is the only way we’re going to stop providers from selling care to patients that they don’t need.

Thanks for reading.  

About the Authors

David Burda

Dave is 4sight Health’s biggest news junkie, resident journalist and healthcare historian. He began covering healthcare in 1983 and hasn’t stopped since. Dave writes his own column, “Burda on Health,” for us, contributes weekly blog posts, and manages our weekly e-newsletter and weekly podcast, 4sight Friday and 4sight Roundup. Dave believes that healthcare is a business like any other business, and customers—patients—are king. If you do what’s right for patients, good business results will follow. Follow Burda on Twitter @DavidRBurda and on LinkedIn.

Recent Posts

Blog
The Health Literacy Gap Between Doctors and Patients
Overheard in every household in the U.S. at one point or another:  Someone other than you: “Well, what… Read More
By October 21, 2021
Dave's Dispatch
Home Is Where the Hospital Is
My sister recently gave me a t-shirt that proclaims, “I speak in movie lines, song lyrics and sarcasm.”… Read More
By October 18, 2021
Default Image
4sight Health Radio
SONG: Sweet Hospital at Home
Check out all the 4sight Health songs here Sweet Hospital at Home To the tune of “Sweet Home Alabama”… Read More
By and October 18, 2021