← Back to Insights
October 23, 2024
Authors
David Burda
Topics
Outcomes Policy System Dynamics
Channels
Blogs

It’s Time to Take People Out of the Interoperability Equation

Earlier this month, Micky Tripathi, Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ASTP/ONC), wrote a candid post for the Health IT Buzz blog. For those keeping track, ASTP/ONC is the new name of the former U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information, or what we used to call ONC.

Anyway, Tripathi said the root cause of information blocking in healthcare is people, not processes or technology.

“What is abundantly clear is that it is behavior, rather than technology, that is far and away the biggest impediment to progress,” he wrote.

It’s not that healthcare organizations can’t share protected health information. It’s that they won’t share protected health information.

We said that in more than a few blog posts and columns like:

Or, if Uwe Reinhardt said it, it’s the people, stupid. He always could get to the point quicker than most. Certainly much quicker than me.

Because here’s the point to this blog post. ASTP/ONC published a little-noticed data brief in September that said clinical laboratories are a big interoperability offender when it comes to sharing lab results with health information exchange organizations (HIE/HIOs). HIE/HIOs used to be called health information exchanges (HIEs). The brief is based on a survey of 77 HIE/HIOs. For the purposes of this blog post, let’s just call them HIOs, OK?

The report broke labs down by four ownership types: hospital-based labs, physician office-based labs, independent/commercial labs and public health labs. The survey asked the HIOs to point the finger at the type of lab that electronically sends test results to the HIO to share with other providers and the type of lab that electronically views or receives test results from an HIO. Basically, who gives and who takes.

In ranked order, the biggest givers in 2023 were:

  • Hospital-based labs (89%)
  • Physician office-based labs (79%)
  • Independent/commercial labs (79%)
  • Public health labs (71%)

In ranked order, the biggest takers in 2023 were:

  • Hospital-based labs (71%)
  • Physician office-based labs (67%)
  • Public health labs (37%)
  • Independent/commercial labs (34%)

Across the board, labs gave more data to HIOs than they took from HIOs. Almost as if they felt obligated to send lab results but not obligated to look at lab results from others. That’s a people problem.

Here’s another people problem: 36% of the HIOs said labs across the board limited or refused to provide access, exchange or use electronic health information. In other words, more than a third of labs didn’t want to play nice with HIOs. That’s a people problem.

By far the biggest offenders were independent/commercial labs. Ninety-six percent of the surveyed HIOs said it was independent/commercial labs that refused to cooperate.

In fact, 38% of the HIOs said independent/commercial labs “often,” “routinely” or “sometimes” engage in information blocking as prohibited by federal regulations.

The survey asked the HIOs why labs didn’t want to place nice with them. The top reason? The labs didn’t see value as a data contributor only, cited by 61% of the HIOs. That’s weird because the labs could view and receive data if they wanted to. So that’s just an excuse, or another people problem.

Maybe it’s time to take people out of the interoperability equation and let machines talk to machines through the Internet of Things.

Thanks for reading.

About the Author

David Burda

David Burda began covering healthcare in 1983 and hasn’t stopped since. Dave writes this monthly column “Burda on Healthcare,” contributes weekly blog posts, manages our weekly newsletter 4sight Friday, and hosts our weekly Roundup podcast. Dave believes that healthcare is a business like any other business, and customers — patients — are king. If you do what’s right for patients, good business results will follow.

Dave’s personnel experiences with the healthcare system both as a patient and family caregiver have shaped his point of view. It’s also been shaped by covering the industry for 40 years as a reporter and editor. He worked at Modern Healthcare for 25 years, the last 11 as editor.

Prior to Modern Healthcare, he did stints at the American Medical Record Association (now AHIMA) and the American Hospital Association. After Modern Healthcare, he wrote a monthly column for Twin Cities Business explaining healthcare trends to a business audience, and he developed and executed content marketing plans for leading healthcare corporations as the editorial director for healthcare strategies at MSP Communications.

When he’s not reading and writing about healthcare, Dave spends his time riding the trails of DuPage County, IL, on his bike, tending his vegetable garden and daydreaming about being a lobster fisherman in Maine. He lives in Wheaton, IL, with his lovely wife of 40 years and his three children, none of whom want to be journalists or lobster fishermen.

Recent Posts

Outcomes
Patients Shrug at Prior Authorization
You should know by now that hospitals and doctors hate prior authorization (PA) requirements by health plans. Providers… Read More
By October 30, 2024
Policy
Podcast: Should We or Should We Not Tax Not-for-Profit Hospitals? 10/17/24
Should we tax not-for-profit hospitals? That was the question we discussed on the new episode of the 4sight… Read More
By October 17, 2024
Default Image
Policy
4sight Friday 10/11/24
4sight Friday | Why Drug Prices Are Immune to Policy Interventions | Healthcare Revolutionaries Are In Constant Motion… Read More
By October 11, 2024